In a ruling Wednesday, U.S. District Judge John Bates said those claims could move forward in court. But some other, more specific arguments made by the unions — including that the U.S. Health and Human Services Department violated health care privacy laws by allowing DOGE access — were dismissed by the judge.
The federal Privacy Act generally prohibits an agency from disclosing records about a person to another agency, unless the person has first given written permission.
“This Court is the first to admit that seeing someone's name and SSN in the 648th row of a spreadsheet is ‘different in kind’ from peeping into someone's bedroom window,” Bates wrote. Still, he said, Congress enacted the Privacy Act to protect the privacy of people identified in federally maintained systems, so that individuals could trust their information would be accessed only by those employees with a valid need to see it.
“As a result, an intrusion upon that sphere — even if the sphere literally encompasses only one row of millions in a dataset — amounts to an injury similar to the intrusion upon other private spheres, such as one's home,” Bates wrote.
Bates also said the case is likely to undergo a lot of “twists and turns” before it is resolved.
“This is a dynamic case undergirded by a set of facts evolving before the Court’s eyes,” he wrote.
DOGE has also accessed other government databases, including at the Education Department, Treasury, IRS and Social Security Administration, and multiple lawsuits have been filed in response.
Credit: AP
Credit: AP